What your company publishes, and how the market sees it.
Hark drafts posts from your sources, sends them to channel reviewers, and tracks your website, competitor pages and the answers AI assistants give about you.
Posts drafted from your sources, reviewed by channel.
Reviewers outside Hark comment on a draft through a review link. Approved posts are scheduled from the same place.
- Drafted from approved materialSOURCES
- Commented on through a review linkCHANNEL REVIEW
- Scheduled once approvedPUBLISHING
To
LILinkedIn · Company page
Subject
Post · Site feasibility in oncology
Hark drafted this reply 2mfrom 2 sources · edit anything
Rewrite shorter
Site feasibility decides an oncology trial before the first patient is screened.
At SITC this week, three sponsor teams described the same move: feasibility questions answered from the protocol itself, with the passage quoted.
The poster summary is linked below.
SourcesDOC-31 · SITC poster summaryREC-0088 · Conversation, 8 NovWEB-0412 · Company blog
⌘↵
How the market sees you, week by week.
Website visits by account
Which accounts read which pages, matched by company.
AI answers that mention you
What AI assistants say when buyers ask about your category.
Competitor pages
Pricing, product, news and careers pages, with each change on the account’s timeline.
Start the week on the accounts that are moving.
A walkthrough of Hark with the team that builds it, on accounts from your own market.