Skip to content

Every claim traced to its source. Reviewed wherever your process requires it.

Hark drafts from approved material and cites each claim. Reviewers see the quote beside the claim, approvers see the reviewer’s decision, and the trail keeps both.

A cited draft waiting at the Reviewer stage, on the phone.
The For review queue: an outbound email with each claim beside its cited source, at the Reviewer stage, with the audit trail.

Draft, Reviewer, Approver.

The stages your MLR process already names, with a person and a time at every step.

  • At review

    1. DraftHark · 7 Nov, 09:12
    2. Reviewer · nowKira Sentrenko (you)
    3. ApproverAshley Waldrep · Medical
  • At approval

    1. DraftHark · 7 Nov, 09:12
    2. ReviewerKira Sentrenko · 7 Nov, 11:40
    3. Approver · nowAshley Waldrep · Medical
  • Approved

    1. DraftHark · 7 Nov, 09:12
    2. ReviewerKira Sentrenko · 7 Nov, 11:40
    3. ApproverAshley Waldrep · 7 Nov, 16:20
  • Changes requested

    1. DraftHark · 7 Nov, 09:12
    2. Reviewer · changesKira Sentrenko · 7 Nov, 11:40
    3. ApproverAshley Waldrep · Medical

    Rejected

    1. DraftHark · 7 Nov, 09:12
    2. Reviewer · rejectedKira Sentrenko · 7 Nov, 11:40
    3. ApproverAshley Waldrep · Medical
  • Sources, quoted

    A claim with no source is flagged before review. An older figure on the source page is shown and left uncited.

  • A trail for every message

    Who drafted, who reviewed, who approved, what changed and what was sent, kept with the record.

  • Your policy, named on every review

    Each review item shows the SOP it is reviewed under.

Start the week on the accounts that are moving.

A walkthrough of Hark with the team that builds it, on accounts from your own market.